Representative of how Tweety operates, he zeroed out funds to help addicts caught in the opioid crisis in his budget.  He quit the Paris Accords, representative of how the world can work together, more symbolic than BINDING FOR ANY COUNTRY.  Preens at the NATO Summit and makes foolish, irrelevant commentary about his election at the G20.  He is transparent and silly in his desire to get the European Union and our allies in NATO to bow to his demands that they trade only with the USA.  He wants NATO countries to spend their 2% on defense on US made weapons.  The tax plan he has is to make him and his rich neighbors richer.  He has no infrastructure plan.  He is betraying the Iraqi Christian immigrants that voted for him.

The Six Blind Men and the Elephant.  People who voted for Tweety thought they knew what change they were getting.  But each voter had a different idea of what Tweety was going to do for them.  While he has done some thing she promised, Tweety has shamed his accomplishments with stupid decisions and worse tweets.  He is not "Governing" well, and maybe never will. 

"Blind Men and the Elephant
Blind Men and the Elephant – A Picture of Relativism and Tolerance
The Blind Men and the Elephant is a famous Indian fable that tells the story of six blind sojourners that come across different parts of an elephant in their life journeys. In turn, each blind man creates his own version of reality from that limited experience and perspective. In philosophy departments throughout the world, the Blind Men and the Elephant has become the poster child for moral relativism and religious tolerance.

[The lessons can be more broadly used in my opinion, beyond religious tolerance. Ideologically we are at war in America,  In our tribalism we are hurting the nation we love by insisting on OUR VIEW AS ONLY VIEW OF VALUE]

Blind Men and the Elephant – A Poem by John Godfrey Saxe
Here is John Godfrey Saxe’s (1816-1887) version of Blind Men and the Elephant:

It was six men of Indostan,
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind.

The First approach'd the Elephant,
And happening to fall
Against his broad and sturdy side,
At once began to bawl:
"God bless me! but the Elephant
Is very like a wall!"

The Second, feeling of the tusk,
Cried, -"Ho! what have we here
So very round and smooth and sharp?
To me 'tis mighty clear,
This wonder of an Elephant
Is very like a spear!"

The Third approach'd the animal,
And happening to take
The squirming trunk within his hands,
Thus boldly up and spake:
"I see," -quoth he- "the Elephant
Is very like a snake!"

The Fourth reached out an eager hand,
And felt about the knee:
"What most this wondrous beast is like
Is mighty plain," -quoth he,-
"'Tis clear enough the Elephant
Is very like a tree!"

The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
Said- "E'en the blindest man
Can tell what this resembles most;
Deny the fact who can,
This marvel of an Elephant
Is very like a fan!"

The Sixth no sooner had begun
About the beast to grope,
Then, seizing on the swinging tail
That fell within his scope,
"I see," -quoth he,- "the Elephant
Is very like a rope!"
And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!

MORAL,

So, oft in theologic wars
The disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean;
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen! "

http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/blind-men-and-the-elephant.htm

If we open our minds like we open our eyes we can see the other person's views.