What are the odds that if we truly burned all the oil on the planet that our atmosphere would be unaffected? If we use all of any resource, to start, we are dumber than dirt. Obviously we do not want to rid the planet of all its oil.
Science cannot say today with 100% certainty that humans can kill the planet, and climate change deniers can suggest our planet would not be affected if we burned ALL fossil fuels FOR THE SAME REASON - we are not 50 years in the future and we are not able to burn all fossil fuels in a day.
Both arguments are flawed, but which one is about the frog boiling itself today?.
Yep, and the moon is made of blue cheese my friend.
The same guy thinks all the CO2 emitted would feed our plants. Wow! So it would make our plants grow to burn all the oil?
"What If We Burn All The Fossil Fuels?"
Eamon Winden | July 22, 2013 | Leave a Comment
http://mahb.stanford.edu/library-item/what-if-we-burn-all-the-fossil-fuels/
Too technical for me and most . . . but scientific.
Less technical:
"What Would Happen If We Burned All The Fossil Fuels On Earth?"
We'll burn that bridge when we come to it
By Mary Beth Griggs September 11, 2015
http://www.popsci.com/burning-all-fossil-fuels-could-raise-sea-levels-by-200-feet
""Our findings show that if we do not want to melt Antarctica, we can't keep taking fossil fuel carbon out of the ground and just dumping it into the atmosphere as CO2 like we've been doing," climate scientist and co-author of the paper Ken Caldeira said in a press release. "Most previous studies of Antarctica have focused on loss of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Our study demonstrates that burning coal, oil, and gas also risks loss of the much larger East Antarctic Ice Sheet.""
Good site for discussion points . . .
"How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic: Responses to the most common skeptical arguments on global warming"
"Below is a complete listing of the articles in “How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic,” a series by Coby Beck containing responses to the most common skeptical arguments on global warming. There are four separate taxonomies; arguments are divided by:
Stages of Denial,
Scientific Topics,
Types of Argument, and
Levels of Sophistication.
Individual articles will appear under multiple headings and may even appear in multiple subcategories in the same heading."
http://grist.org/series/skeptics/
Be aware! Beware!
